Monday, February 27, 2012

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun? [Displays]

Source: http://gizmodo.com/5888618/display-battle-which-phones-and-tablets-dominate-in-the-sun

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?Dr. Raymond Soneira of DisplayMate Technologies has made it his mission to suss out the best smartphone, tablet, HDTV, and multimedia displays from the worst with his Display Technology Shoot-Out series. Here, he tackles the best mobile screens under light. And the results may surprise you.

Tablet and phone screens are gorgeous these days—as long as you're somewhere with walls and a ceiling. Even then, the sun's violent rays can make reading your slate a pain. So which display wins? We've got answers.

DisplayMate's visual wizard Raymond Soneira put the iPad 2, Kindle Fire, Xoom, Galaxy Tab 10.1, iPhone 4, HTC Desire, Droid X, and Galaxy S through an enormous range of lighting conditions—pitch black to full outdoor sunlight. Unless you're planning on using your iPad on the surface of the sun, these are pretty much the only lighting conditions that matter. Now let's go outside.


Introduction

Tablets and Smartphones are all used under a very wide range of ambient lighting conditions that are frequently much brighter than for other displays – like laptops, desktops, and HDTVs. The screens reflect a considerable amount of the surrounding light, which washes out the images you are trying to see. The differences in display brightness and reflectance between models results in large differences in their screen readability, visibility and picture quality, especially under brighter ambient lighting. We demonstrate those differences visually by photographing them inside a laboratory Integrating Hemisphere using a powerful light source under a wide range of lighting levels.

Other than jacking up the screen Brightness, manufacturers have done very little to improve screen readability and picture quality under high ambient lighting. In fact, the displays on virtually all Tablets and Smartphones are mirrors that are good enough to use for personal grooming even in ordinary indoor ambient lighting. There are many anti-reflection coatings and treatments that can be used to significantly improve this situation together with color and intensity scale management profiles derived from the ambient light sensor. The second big payoff is that the display can then be viewed with a lower Brightness setting, which improves the running time on battery – something all users care about that provides a significant competitive edge.

There is very little information (other than anecdotal) on how Tablet and Smartphone displays perform and degrade under bright ambient lighting. Our Mobile Display Technology Shoot-Out article series measures the percentage of light reflected by each of the tested mobile screens, and our Auto Brightness Display Shoot-Out examines the optimum screen brightness levels needed under varying ambient light levels. In this article we photographically compare the displays on the Apple iPad 2, Amazon Kindle Fire, Motorola Xoom, and Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 at 8 ambient light levels from absolute darkness (0 lux) up through almost direct sunlight (40,000 lux). An accompanying article performs the same comparison on 4 Smartphones.

Results Highlights

When viewed and photographed in absolute darkness (0 lux) the Tablets and Smartphones all appear fairly similar, with differences in color saturation as the standout feature. But as the Ambient Lighting gets brighter the light reflected from the screens rises and begins washing out the display's native colors and image intensities, eventually dominating and then overwhelming the entire image on screen as seen in the Screen Photograph sections below and in the accompanying article on Smartphones. As that happens the differences between the Tablet and Smartphone displays become quite noticeable and substantial.

The Screens

The cover glass and additional layers (such as the touch screen and optional screen protector if you use one) that lie over the display panel currently don't get as much attention or respect as they deserve for their considerable impact on picture quality and screen visibility in bright lighting. People primarily think about their impact on scratch resistance, breakage, and fingerprints. The reason they are so important to the image quality is that any external light that is reflected from the screen travels through the top layers twice: once on the way in and then again on the way out after being reflected. So if the layers affect the image characteristics by "x" then the reflected component is affected by x2 (not 2x), which is considerably larger. So any problems or irregularities in the screens are magnified in bright ambient lighting. Consumers should use care in selecting a screen protector, because many increase the screen reflectance considerably, even those that claim to reduce it.

The Best: Apple iPhone 4 and iPad 2 and the Samsung Galaxy S and Tab 10.1

With DisplayMate Contrast Ratings for High Ambient Light of 47 or more the Apple and Samsung displays deliver the best screen visibility and picture quality in bright environments as seen in the Screen Photographs sections below and in the accompanying article on Smartphones. In bright lighting the Apple and Samsung screens are fairly color neutral and do not impart any noticeable color caste, and there were no noticeable image irregularities introduced by the upper screen layers. While the Apple and Samsung models are decidedly the best, both the Lab Contrast Rating measurements and the Screen Photographs show that the Samsung Galaxy models are somewhat better – so Samsung is the declared winner for High Ambient Light performance, but only by a nose…


The Worst: Amazon Kindle Fire, HTC Desire, and the Motorola Xoom and Droid X

With DisplayMate Contrast Ratings for High Ambient Light in the teens, 20s and low 30s the Amazon, HTC, and Motorola displays delivered much worse screen visibility and picture quality in bright environments as seen in the Screen Photographs sections below and in the accompanying article on Smartphones. The HTC Desire came in decidedly last place with by far the poorest performance. In bright lighting the Kindle Fire has a noticeable diagonal crosshatch pattern from the touch screen conductors, and the Droid X has noticeable diagonal banding introduced by variations in bonding the top layers. There is also a noticeable color caste introduced by the upper layers of the screens: the Kindle Fire has a green caste, the Xoom a blue caste, and the Desire and Droid X a cyan caste.

Range of Ambient Lighting

Our eyes have a tremendous dynamic range because everyday we experience a tremendous range of ambient lighting levels from absolute darkness (0 lux) up through direct sunlight (120,000 lux). Tablets and Smartphones, as mobile devices, must be viewed under this incredible range of ambient light. Ambient light levels are measured in lux, which is a Lumen per square meter. Below is a list of representative lux levels. The values and ranges are approximate and can vary based on the situation particulars including location, orientation, time of day, and time of year. The outdoor levels are for sunlight at noon.

Tablets and Smartphones tend to be held at angles that pick up more of the surrounding ambient light than the more vertically oriented screens in laptops, desktops, and HDTVs. On the other hand, for Tablets and Smartphones in many cases you can change your orientation, location, and viewing angle to reduce the amount of light being picked up by the screens.

Lab Screen Photographs and Measurements with Ambient Lighting

In the Screen Photographs sections below we visually compare the Tablet display's visibility and image contrast. There are two sets: The first set shows the 4 Tablets side-by-side for each individual lux level so you can directly compare their relative performance. The second set shows all of the lux levels together for each of the Tablets individually, so you can see how rapidly each Tablet degrades with ambient light.

The screen photographs were all taken inside a large Integrating Hemisphere that uniformly illuminates the screen in all directions with a powerful daylight 6500 Kelvin light source. Missing from the Lab photos are the superimposed images you would see of your face and surrounding objects that are embedded within the screen reflections. The Tablets were all set to their Maximum Brightness and the Ambient Lighting Levels were measured with a Konica Minolta T-10M Illuminance Meter. We used one of our proprietary DisplayMate Ambient Light Test Patterns with 10 scales in 8 colors (including gray/white) each with 25 intensity steps. As the Ambient Light Level increases you will be able to make out fewer and fewer of the intensity steps. The two Reverse Scales make it possible to count the number of invisible or barely visible steps. Tablets with a larger High Ambient Light Contrast Rating will show more of the Intensity Scale at a given lux level. The more steps you can see the better the Tablet display.

Important Note for Viewing All of the Photos:

The photos are all taken with the camera's automatic exposure, which will vary based on the total brightness of the image (display plus reflected light). That's the same way your eyes process all images. The borders between the photos are at true Black. Use them to compare the Black Levels in the photos. All of the photos are taken at the display's maximum brightness setting, which is also its maximum power setting. The visibility of image content will decrease at lower settings. Most Automatic Brightness Controls will significantly lower the display brightness settings below 5,000 lux in order to save power and increase the running time on battery. It's a challenging compromise that all current Automatic Brightness Controls perform poorly…

Lab Screen Photographs with Ambient Lighting for all Tablets Side-by-Side

Comparisons of the Apple iPad 2, Amazon Kindle Fire, Motorola Xoom, and Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1.
The lux level descriptions are representative. Refer to the Ranges listed in Table 1 above for an overview.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?0 lux – Absolute Darkness
In absolute darkness you will see the best picture quality with the best color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy that the display can produce. There is no ambient light to wash out the colors, intensities, and image contrast on the display. If you are a purist obsessed with Black Levels and Contrast Ratios this will either be your best or most irritating viewing conditions. Be sure to significantly lower the Brightness setting of the display in order to reduce eye strain. For LCDs, this will also significantly lower the visibility of the annoying Black Levels (they will already be close to zero for OLED displays). All 4 of the tested Tablets have LCD displays. But… the eye's light sensitivity increases in the dark so you will actually notice the Black Levels more when viewing dark images in the dark. At slightly higher Ambient Lighting (below) the Black Levels will become less noticeable – this is referred to as Bias Lighting.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?300 lux – Moderate Indoor Lighting
At the moderate indoor ambient light levels the images should appear only slightly degraded from the 0 lux images that are shown above. The images should show very good color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. There is not much ambient light to wash out the colors and contrast on the display, but the Screen Reflectance is already larger than each of the display's own Black Level.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?1,000 lux – Bright Indoor Lighting
At the bright indoor ambient light levels the images appear noticeably degraded from the 0 lux and 300 lux images above. The images should still show satisfactory color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. The ambient light is starting to noticeably wash out the colors and image contrast on the display. The images on the iPad and Galaxy Tab are not as washed out as on the Kindle Fire and Xoom due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?2,000 lux – Outdoor Lighting in Heavy Shade
At outdoor lighting in heavy shade ambient light levels the images appear more degraded than the 1,000 lux images above. The ambient light is noticeably washing out the colors and image contrast on the display. The images on the iPad and Galaxy Tab are not as washed out as on the Kindle Fire and Xoom due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?5,000 lux – Moderate Overcast Sky or Direct Sunlight in Heavy Shade
For moderate overcast sky ambient light levels the images appear significantly degraded from the previous sets. This lux level also corresponds to the shadow cast by a person in direct sunlight that falls on the display screen they are viewing. The images are showing significantly reduced color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. The ambient light is significantly washing out the colors and image contrast on the display. The images on the iPad and Galaxy Tab are not as washed out as on the Kindle Fire and Xoom due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?10,000 lux – Moderate Outdoor Daylight
For moderate outdoor daylight ambient light levels the images appear substantially degraded. The images show large reductions in color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. The high ambient light is substantially washing out the colors and image contrast on each display. The images on the iPad and Galaxy Tab are not as washed out as on the Kindle Fire and Xoom due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?20,000 lux – Full Daylight Not in Direct Sunlight or Indirect Indoor Sunlight
For full daylight not in direct sunlight or indirect indoor sunlight ambient light levels these images are barely visible. The images on the iPad and Galaxy Tab are not as washed out as on the Kindle Fire and Xoom due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?40,000 lux – Indirect Outdoor Sunlight
At the indirect outdoor sunlight ambient light levels these images are almost invisible. The images on the iPad and Galaxy Tab are not as washed out as on the Kindle Fire and Xoom due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Lab Screen Photographs with Ambient Lighting for all Smartphones Side-by-Side

Comparisons of the Apple iPhone 4, HTC Desire, Motorola Droid X, and Samsung Galaxy S.
The lux level descriptions are representative. Refer to the Ranges listed in Table 1 above for an overview.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?0 lux – Absolute Darkness
In absolute darkness you will see the best picture quality with the best color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy that the display can produce. There is no ambient light to wash out the colors, intensities, and image contrast on the display. If you are a purist obsessed with Black Levels and Contrast Ratios this will either be your best or most irritating viewing conditions. Be sure to significantly lower the Brightness setting of the display in order to reduce eye strain. For LCDs, this will also significantly lower the visibility of the annoying Black Levels (they will already be close to zero for OLED displays). The iPhone 4 and Droid X have LCD displays and the HTC Desire and Galaxy S have OLED displays. But… the eye's light sensitivity increases in the dark so you will actually notice the Black Levels more when viewing dark images in the dark. At slightly higher Ambient Lighting (below) the Black Levels will become less noticeable – this is referred to as Bias Lighting.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?300 lux – Moderate Indoor Lighting
At the moderate indoor ambient light levels the images should appear only slightly degraded from the 0 lux images that are shown above. The images should show very good color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. There is not much ambient light to wash out the colors and contrast on the display, but the Screen Reflectance is already larger than each of the display's own Black Level.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?1,000 lux – Bright Indoor Lighting
At the bright indoor ambient light levels the images appear noticeably degraded from the 0 lux and 300 lux images above. The images should still show satisfactory color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. The ambient light is starting to noticeably wash out the colors and image contrast on the display. The images on the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are not as washed out as on the HTC Desire and Droid X due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?2,000 lux – Outdoor Lighting in Heavy Shade
At outdoor lighting in heavy shade ambient light levels the images appear more degraded than the 1,000 lux images above. The ambient light is noticeably washing out the colors and image contrast on the display. The images on the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are not as washed out as on the HTC Desire and Droid X due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?5,000 lux – Moderate Overcast Sky or Direct Sunlight in Heavy Shade
For moderate overcast sky ambient light levels the images appear significantly degraded from the previous sets. This lux level also corresponds to the shadow cast by a person in direct sunlight that falls on the display screen they are viewing. The images are showing significantly reduced color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. The ambient light is significantly washing out the colors and image contrast on the display. The images on the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are not as washed out as on the HTC Desire and Droid X due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?10,000 lux – Moderate Outdoor Daylight
For moderate outdoor daylight ambient light levels the images appear substantially degraded. The images show large reductions in color, image contrast, and gray scale accuracy. The high ambient light is substantially washing out the colors and image contrast on each display. The images on the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are not as washed out as on the HTC Desire and Droid X due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?20,000 lux – Full Daylight Not in Direct Sunlight or Indirect Indoor Sunlight
For full daylight not in direct sunlight or indirect indoor sunlight ambient light levels these images are barely visible. The images on the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are not as washed out as on the HTC Desire and Droid X due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

Display Battle: Which Phones and Tablets Dominate in the Sun?40,000 lux – Indirect Outdoor Sunlight
At the indirect outdoor sunlight ambient light levels these images are almost invisible. The images on the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are not as washed out as on the HTC Desire and Droid X due to their larger Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light.

This article has been republished with permission from Dr. Raymond Soneira is President of DisplayMate Technologies Corporation of Amherst, New Hampshire, which produces video calibration, evaluation, and diagnostic products for consumers, technicians, and manufacturers. See www.displaymate.com. He is a research scientist with a career that spans physics, computer science, and television system design. Dr. Soneira obtained his Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics from Princeton University, spent 5 years as a Long-Term Member of the world famous Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, another 5 years as a Principal Investigator in the Computer Systems Research Laboratory at AT&T Bell Laboratories, and has also designed, tested, and installed color television broadcast equipment for the CBS Television Network Engineering and Development Department. He has authored over 35 research articles in scientific journals in physics and computer science, including Scientific American. If you have any comments or questions about the article, you can contact him at dtso.info@displaymate.com.

About DisplayMate Technologies
DisplayMate Technologies specializes in advanced mathematical display technology optimizations and precision analytical scientific display diagnostics and calibrations to deliver outstanding image and picture quality and accuracy – while increasing the effective visual Contrast Ratio of the display and producing a higher calibrated brightness than is achievable with traditional calibration methods. This also decreases display power requirements and increases the battery run time in mobile displays. This article is a lite version of our intensive scientific analysis of smartphone and mobile displays – before the benefits of our advanced mathematical DisplayMate Display Optimization Technology, which can correct or improve many of the deficiencies – including higher calibrated brightness, power efficiency, effective screen contrast, picture quality and color and gray scale accuracy under both bright and dim ambient light, and much more. Our advanced scientific optimizations can make lower cost panels look as good or better than more expensive higher performance displays. For more information on our technology see the Summary description of our Adaptive Variable Metric Display Optimizer AVDO. If you are a display or product manufacturer and want our expertise and technology to turn your display into a spectacular one to surpass your competition then Contact DisplayMate Technologies to learn more.

Read More...

Qualcomm's Gobi modem chipsets combine 84Mbps HSPA+, LTE-Advanced

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/qualcomm-outs-new-gobi-modem-chipsets/

Qualcomm Gobi chipsets support HSPA+, LTE-Advanced, carrier aggregationMultiple goodies on a single chipset? Yes, it's Qualcomm again, this time spreading word at MWC of its new Gobi modems. These will be the first to support both HSPA+ Release 10 (84Mbps on dual carriers) and LTE-Advanced, while two of the new Gobis (the MDM9225 and MDM9625) will additionally support true LTE Category 4 with carrier aggregation, for increased bandwidth across multiple radio channels and speeds of up to 150Mbps. The chips also boast lower power consumption thanks to their 28nm fabrication process, and are backwards compatible with older standards like GSM, EV-DO Advanced, TD-SCDMA and both FDD and TDD types of LTE. Hungry for more 3LAs? You'll find plenty in the press release below.

Continue reading Qualcomm's Gobi modem chipsets combine 84Mbps HSPA+, LTE-Advanced

Qualcomm's Gobi modem chipsets combine 84Mbps HSPA+, LTE-Advanced originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:37:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Carrier IQ opens up IQCare diagnostics platform to smartphone users

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/carrier-iq-opens-up-iqcare-diagnostics-platform-to-smartphone-us/

Carrier IQ has announced the extension of its IQ Care platform to enable mobile operators to share the insight gained with its customers. The analytics software measures diagnostic information on your phone relating to network usage, battery life and dropped calls. Previously it's only been available to customer care agents as they remotely diagnose your phone during a support call, but the platform is now being opened up so that data can be viewable on open customer service portals. It's hoped that people will learn how to resolve network issues, the company remarking that 40 percent of smartphones are returned, only to be found not to have any faults at all. It'll launch in the second quarter of the year and you can find out a whole heap more if you head on past the break.

Continue reading Carrier IQ opens up IQCare diagnostics platform to smartphone users

Carrier IQ opens up IQCare diagnostics platform to smartphone users originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:04:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Nokia 808 PureView first sample shots -- feast your eyes (update: GigaPan them!)

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/nokia-808-pureview-first-sample-shots-feast-your-eyes/

Nokia 808 PureView first sample shots -- feast your eyes
This is it. Here's an exclusive first look at some sample shots taken with Nokia's freshly minted 808 PureView imaging powerhouse -- and wow, just wow! The collection contains photos taken at different resolutions in various conditions that show exactly what the 41-megapixel camera is capable of. Feast your eyes in our gallery below -- we'll have a ZIP file with the original pictures for you to download shortly. Also, stay tuned for our upcoming interview with Damian Dinning, program manager for imaging at Nokia.

Update: Our very own Andy Yang of Engadget Chinese slapped a few of these shots on GigaPan for your zooming pleasure -- check it out after the break. You can also grab the originals (a 31.8MB download) from Nokia Conversations.

Continue reading Nokia 808 PureView first sample shots -- feast your eyes (update: GigaPan them!)

Nokia 808 PureView first sample shots -- feast your eyes (update: GigaPan them!) originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:05:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

AT&T HTC One X hands-on

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/atandt-htc-one-x-hands-on/

HTC One X
Are you salivating after seeing HTC's One X? We don't blame you, it's a stunning piece of hardware with a set of rather lust-worthy specs. But, how does the AT&T version stack up to its international cousin? We're happy to say, quite well. Yes, the quad-core Tegra 3 was given the boot in favor of a 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 and an LTE radio was crammed inside, but otherwise this is pretty much the same device we saw on the floor in Barcelona. The only piece of carrier branding is an AT&T logo above the gorgeous 4.7-inch 720p display. Thankfully, the design was left largely unmolested. At least at this early stage it's also blissfully free of bloatware and carrier apps, but we'd expect that to change before launch. Sadly, none of the demo units on hand at the New York showroom had SIMs in them, so we couldn't test LTE reception, and the devices weren't logged into the Market so we couldn't pull down benchmarks or a taxing 3D game. That being said, Sense 4.0 and ICS were plenty responsive and pages rendered very quickly -- even without those two extra cores. Check out the gallery below and the video after the break for more impressions.

Continue reading AT&T HTC One X hands-on

AT&T HTC One X hands-on originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:26:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Intel details Medfield plans, announces a trio of phone-friendly Atoms

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/

Medfield
The age of Medfield is upon us. At Mobile World Congress Intel took the wraps off its smartphone platform, ditched the code name and gave us some details on three different Atom chips destined for handsets. The Z2460 is currently shipping and serves as the heart of the reference platform that devices from Lenovo, Orange, Lava and ZTE are based on. The processor can hit clock speeds of 2GHz and packs an Intel XMM 6260 HSPA+ radio. The next generation part, dubbed the Z2580 will supposedly double performance and gets upgraded to an XMM 7160, which adds LTE to its cellular arsenal. Down the road Chipzilla also plans to introduce a "value smartphone" processor, dubbed the Z2000. Clocked at only 1GHz and going with a 6265 HSPA+ radio, the goal is to power Android phones that can be sold for less than $150 -- unsubsidized. Sounds crazy, but it's true. To bring this vision to fruition Intel has added Orange, ZTE, Lava and Visa to its list of partners. Check out the PR after the break for more details.

Continue reading Intel details Medfield plans, announces a trio of phone-friendly Atoms

Intel details Medfield plans, announces a trio of phone-friendly Atoms originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:31:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Orange Santa Clara packs Intel power, we go hands-on at MWC 2012 (video)

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/orange-santa-clara-hands-on/

Hot on the heels of Intel's big event, we've finally got our hands on Orange's Medfield smartphone. The Santa Clara is powered by the Intel Atom Z2460 1.6GHz processor, clocked at 1.6GHz. It does have 2011's Gingerbread kind of Android, but Orange is promising to bring ICS to the phone soon after launch -- in fact an Intel spokesperson told us that it's already had Android 4.0 running on these devices. There's a few differences between this and the Xolo X900 by Lava -- so we've given it a judicious investigation at Intel's big launch party. We'll be adding our hands-on video very soon, but our hands-on thoughts are after the break.

Continue reading Orange Santa Clara packs Intel power, we go hands-on at MWC 2012 (video)

Orange Santa Clara packs Intel power, we go hands-on at MWC 2012 (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:03:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/

Intel's Medfield-based Android smartphones have been buzzed about for sometime now, but until this past CES, we hadn't actually seen one of these unicorns en vivo. No longer, as the chip manufacturer outed a trio of those very handsets today at its MWC event. Of particular note is the Xolo by Lava, a 4.03-inch, single-core unit running a mostly stock build of Gingerbread and destined for the Indian market. We spent time getting to know the device, so follow on past the break as we parse through its finer qualities.

Continue reading Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on

Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Panasonic, DoCoMo, NEC and Fujitsu create IP for multi-standard LSI chip; supports LTE, GSM, W-CDMA and HSPA+

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/panasonic-docomo-nec-and-fujitsu-create-ip-for-multi-standard/

Marvell was first to introduce a single-chip LTE world modem with support for multiple mobile standards late last year, and now Panasonic Mobile Communications, NTT DoCoMo, NEC and Fujitsu have developed intellectual property (hardware and software) for something similar of their own. Specifically, the quartet has gone further with the chip aspect, though. They've tested an "engineering sample" of a the large-scale integration chip (pictured) for modems in mobile devices, and claim that it uses twenty percent less juice than larger two-chip designs. That consolidation, also makes it cheaper to produce. Past that, the chip has successfully provided "interconnectivity between the mobile networks of major vendors," getting it a step closer to production. The silicon lets modems play nice with FDD-LTE, TDD-LTE, GSM, W-CDMA and HSPA+, specifically, and LTE-Advanced support is in the cards for the future. Although Panasonic, DoCoMo, NEC and Fujitsu are the main partners, other "major players" are said to be on board for a "joint venture," with the goal of commercializing it in countries outside of (and including) Japan. The word's mum on when we can expect the chip to make it past the sampling phase, but in the meantime, hit up the press release after the break for more knowledge.

Continue reading Panasonic,! DoCoMo, NEC and Fujitsu create IP for multi-standard LSI chip; supports LTE, GSM, W-CDMA and HSPA+

Panasonic, DoCoMo, NEC and Fujitsu create IP for multi-standard LSI chip; supports LTE, GSM, W-CDMA and HSPA+ originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:05:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceNTT DoCoMo  | Email this | Comments

Read More...

Huawei's Ascend D Quad Phone Looks Ferocious [Android]

Source: http://gizmodo.com/5888343/huaweis-ascend-d-quad-phone-look-ferocious

Huawei's Ascend D Quad Phone Looks FerociousHuawei isn't exactly the first name you think of when it comes to high-end smartphone. In fact, it may be among the last. Its new 4.5-inch, Ice-Cream Sandwich running, quad-core with 16 core graphics processor and LTE may change that.

Engadget was on-hand as the Ascend D made its debut at MWC in Barcelona just now. It's got a 4.5-inch 720p screen, giving it a pixel density of a very impressing 330ppi, which matches the iPhone 4S. It also has Dolby 5.1 Sound integrated into it. One might wonder what the hell you need 5.1 sound on a phone for. Good question. The smart money says that would be for beaming music and movies to your home entertainment center. Pretty cool. For all that, it's only 8.9 millimeters thick and it packs an 1800mAh battery, that is supposed to last "one to two days". We'll just see about that.

The big story here, though, is the processor. It's one of the first quad-core smartphones to be officially announced (though we'll likely see more by day's end). This one uses Huawei's own chip, the K3, which is a quad-core A9 that has 16 GPU cores built-in. It will be clocked at makes-your-cheeks-flap-around 1.5GHz. According to Huawei, it benchmarks faster than Nvidia's Tegra 3, runs cooler, and offers up to a 50-percent reduction in power consumption. Them's some bold claims, and we'll have to wait until we can get our hands on one for some real testing.

There will be two other phones in the Ascend series as well. The Ascend D Quad XL seems to be the same as the D Quad, but it packs in a 2300mAh battery, which is muy bueno. There's also the Ascend D1, which is a dual-core version. We don't know when it will be available or how much it'll cost, but it's going to be LTE-ready, have a global launch, and Huawei confirmed that it will be available in the U.S. Looking forward to getting our hands on this thing.[Engadget]

Read More...

Sonyâs Xperia P and U Are the Budget Little Brothers to That Gorgeous Xperia S [Android]

Source: http://gizmodo.com/5888386/sonys-xperia-p-and-u-are-the-budget-little-brothers-to-that-gorgeous-xperia-s/gallery/1

Sony’s Xperia P and U Are the Budget Little Brothers to That Gorgeous Xperia SGiven Sony already torpedoed its Xperia S back at CES, you can aaaaalmost forgive the now-lacking-in-Ericsson company for its lacklustre MWC showings. New Sony boss Kaz Hirai took to the stage to intro the Xperia P and Xperia U phones, which, as rumoured, are both dual-core phones with 8 and 5-megapixel cameras between 'em.

The Xperia U has a 3.5-inch "reality" display, whereas the P has a 4-inch qHD screen, with Sony's new "White Magic" screen tech for using in direct sunlight.

Cameras on both phones can shoot in 2D and 3D modes, and they both use NFC too.

Three UK has confirmed it'll be stocking the Xperia U; you can check out their hands-on video here. Both will be on sale in the first half of 2012, so keep an eye peeled for more networks' confirmations that they'll be stocking 'em…though we'd suggest springing for the Xperia S if you're that-way-inclined. [Gizmodo UK]

Our cousins at Gizmodo UK are on the ground at MWC, bringing you all the latest news from the show. Click here to see their coverage.

Sony’s Xperia P and U Are the Budget Little Brothers to That Gorgeous Xperia S
Sony’s Xperia P and U Are the Budget Little Brothers to That Gorgeous Xperia S

Read More...

HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast [Android]

Source: http://gizmodo.com/5888409/htc-one-s-hands+on-really-solid-really-fast/gallery/1

HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really FastWhile the One X may be HTC's beast of a flagship device, the One S is not far behind. It's packing a new Snapdragon S4 processor into one of the most solidly built phones I've ever put my paws on.

First off, the One S is similar to the One X in many, many ways. Same software, same crazy camera setup with a dedicated image processor, NFC, free Dropbox space, all of that. Read the One X hands-on for more details on that stuff. Now let's get into what's different.

The body is fantastic. Snap impression: my favorite-feeling handset ever. It has an aluminum body that has been put through a multi-arc oxidation process. This gives the aluminum ceramic-like qualities. It was super light, but felt incredibly strong, and it had a really nice "soft" texture to it that isn't going to be a finger-print magnet. Also, at only 7.9mm thick, it's one of the thinnest smartphones out there (the iPhone 4S is 9.3mm, to give you some perspective).

The screen comes in at a now-fairly-standard-for-Andriod 4.3-inches, which is a pretty nice size, but unfortunately its takes a step down in resolution and quality from the One X's 720p Super LCD2. The screen on the One S is a qHD Super AMOLED display, which means a resolution of 960x540. That gives it a pixel density of 256ppi vs. 312 one the One X. That said, Super AMOLEDs have really deep blacks and vibrant colors.

The other major differentiator here is that it's powered by Qualcomm's new dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor, instead of the quad-core Tegra 3 on the One X. While the two fewer cores may be a disappointment to some, I didn't see any lag or hesitation during my brief time with the phone. Actually, it seemed extremely fast. It's clocked to 1.5GHz and it tore through the UI (Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich with HTC's new and seemingly not horrible Sense UI on top). Qualcomm has been trumpeting the S4's power managing ability and performance, so we'll just have to wait and see. We do know, however, that it will work with the HTC MediaLink I mentioned in the One X hands-on, which allows you to beam 1080p video and HD audio to your TV.

This is going to be a global phone, but it will be coming to the U.S. within the next 60 days. T-Mobile will be the first carrier to get it (yes, with 4G), but it may not be the last. No word on pricing yet, but it probably won't be as expensive as the One X. Yes, it's not quite as exciting as its big brother (on AT&T exclusively), but it's still very tasty indeed. Can't wait to test it.

I also got to spend a little time with the One V, which is the low-end model in the One series. It has a 3.7 WVGA Super LCD, and a single-core 1GHz processor. While it only has a 5MP rear-camera, it has the same image chip and optics as the One X and One S which will probably allow it to take decent enough photos. Also, significantly, the software is the exact same, too. Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich with Sense 4.0, which is nice to see in an entry-level device at launch. The One V feels solidly built with its aluminum frame, and they brought back the chin on the lower-part of the phone! (Cue nostalgic sigh from first gen Android users). The phone definitely felt slower in comparison to its siblings, but for an entry-level device, you could definitely do much, much worse. No word on pricing, but it should also be out in the next 60 days.

[Photo credit: Kat Hannaford, Gizmodo UK]

HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast
HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast
HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast
HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast
HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast
HTC One S Hands-On: Really Solid, Really Fast The One V.

Read More...