Source: http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/fujifilm-ships-second-gen-real-3d-camera-calls-it-w3/
Fujifilm ships second-gen Real 3D camera, calls it W3 originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink
3D-Display-info | 
Amazon | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/sony-announces-bloggie-touch-pocket-video-camera/
Continue reading Sony announces Bloggie Touch pocket video camera
Sony announces Bloggie Touch pocket video camera originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/apple-announcing-new-apple-tv/
Continue reading The new Apple TV for $99
The new Apple TV for $99 originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:52:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://lifehacker.com/5625876/google-reader-cuts-the-clutter-with-fullscreen-mode-new-shortcuts
Google quietly updated their popular web-based RSS app Reader with a new fullscreen mode that hides all the clutter and navigation so you can focus exclusively on what you're reading.
You can toggle fullscreen mode on and off by hitting 'f' (as in fullscreen). When you turn on fullscreen, all the navigation, the search box, the external links, and all the rest of the space that isn't about reading your feeds vanishes, and all you're left with is the main content. To pull up the navigation or other buttons (like the always handy "Mark all as read"), you can hover your mouse over the very top of the window. Alternately, keyboard junkies can hit Shift+u to toggle the sidebar navigation, switch sources (Shift+j/k will move you up and down in the navigation sidebar), and open a subscription (Shift+o).
It's not a huge change, but if you spend a lot of time in Reader, it's a welcome one that cuts down on a lot of the default Google Reader clutter.
Source: http://lifehacker.com/5626292/see-how-magazines-rate-colleges-in-a-side+by+side-comparison
It's tempting to simply declare that no board of publication editors can come up with an objective, mathematical means of deciding which college will be right for each person—it's a personal experience, and what you put into it, and so on. But it's helpful to see why one ranking list puts a college near the bottom, while another might find it a Top Value or something similar. And if you're feeling particularly ambitious, you can assemble your own criteria list to judge your undergraduate or graduate choices by examining what the big players use.
What guides, rankings, or other criteria helped you decide on the college you attended? Which are trustworthy, and which seem like so much empty hyperbole?
Posts
